Bush and Howard Stern Both Agree

Our fiscally irresponsible president and America's favorite pervert happen to agree on something. What could they possibly agree upon?

Bush and Howard Stern both share the feeling that parents are "first line of responsibility" when comes to protecting children from indecent material.

I particularly like the stance that Bush takes in this quote:

As a free speech advocate, I often told parents who were complaining about content, you're the first line of responsibility...They put an off button on the TV for a reason. Turn it off.

He also adds more to make me even more appreciative of his agreement with Stern:

I do think though that government can, at times, not censor, but call to account, programming that gets over the line. The problem, of course, is the definition of 'over the line'.

Freedom of speech is part of a group of Natural Laws. These Natural Laws should not be legislated. I hate that America has an FCC. But the FCC is there for those insecure Americans that can't handle people who are indecent. Welcome to America...we provide homes for the indecent. Michael Powell used to be the FCC chairman. He will be replaced obviously with a new FCC chairman. To the new chairman Bush makes this request:

Please tell me where the line is, and make sure you protect the capacity of people to speak freely in our society, but be willing to, if things go too far, call them to account.

As Bush so proudly likes to utter...Amen! Thank you for making it obvious that you support free speech. Now I know you do not support dissent of your administration...but I'll let that slide for the moment. Everyone watch the interview 8 pm Sunday night on C-SPAN from the Map Room of the White House to hear him express his shared feeling with Howard Stern on the parents' role in censorship.

Yep, He Voted...

For the last time, we warn that (Sunday) will be bloody for the Christians and Jews and their mercenaries and whoever takes part in the (election) game of America and Allawi

-Zarqawi's faction

If one person learns in politics, they learn that the terrorist mean what they say...and the only ways to get around their violent acts of destruction are either 1) Kill them before they accomplish their violent acts or 2) Don't provoke them

In the situation of the Iraqi election, we cannot use #2 for obvious reasons. So now the U.S. troops have the job of defending terrorist tactics and helping to protect Iraqis whose mouth salivate at the thought of being able to vote for a new leader. (Two hundred years later, we'll see how voter turnout is doing.)

I have to question the soon-to-be-used practice of marking each voter's index finger with indelible blue ink to make sure they don't vote more than once. This to me is utterly foolish as I can just picture the terrorists yanking people, checking their hand, and then blowing the voter's brains out before he gets back home to appreciate what he just did for the future of Iraq. (**This may be a moot point as the terrorists probably will just fire into polling stations and not even bother to check for markings.**) Bottom line: Isn't there some other way we can make sure people don't vote twice?

Voting begins at 7 am in Iraq. It will be 11 pm in the eastern United States.

Links

With the age of democracy beginning as I type, I have added links to assist in this site's coverage of the events that happen in Iraq from now and on into the future. Here they are:

Hammorabi
Healing Iraq
Iraq At a GlanceIraquna

Also, I have these sites that I use to track the government as they like to hide from the American people often:

James Madison Project
POGO
OMB Watch
Global Security
Freedom Info
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Center for Study of Intelligence
Bush Secrecy

In addition, something extra for those who want to visit another good site:

Crossroads Arabia

Nice seeing you. Later.